When you change a prompt, you can accidentally break outputs that were previously working. Without a test suite, you discover this through user complaints in production. The solution is a structured testing approach adapted for the non-deterministic nature of LLMs.
The four LLM testing strategies
1. Golden Dataset (Regression Testing)
A curated set of 50โ200 input/expected-output pairs. Run your pipeline against these after every change. Flag outputs that deviate from the expected results. This is the single most valuable test type for catching regressions.
2. LLM-as-Judge
Use a separate, high-quality LLM (e.g., Claude Opus) to evaluate your agent's outputs for correctness, relevance, and safety. Score outputs 1โ5 and alert when average score drops below threshold. More flexible than exact-match evaluation.
3. Property-Based Tests
Assert structural properties of outputs that must always hold: "response is valid JSON," "no PII in output," "response length is under 500 tokens," "language is EN." Fast, cheap, and catches format regressions instantly.
4. Adversarial / Red-Team Tests
A fixed set of adversarial inputs โ prompt injection attempts, ambiguous queries, edge cases โ run against every release. Ensures safety and robustness properties don't regress as you iterate.
Automated eval suite with MoltBot
CI/CD integration
- Run property-based tests on every PR (fast, cheap, ~5 seconds).
- Run golden dataset + LLM-as-judge on merge to main (1โ5 minutes).
- Run full red-team suite before production releases.
- Set score thresholds in your pipeline โ block deployment if eval score drops below baseline.
- Track eval scores over time โ a gradual drift is as dangerous as a sharp regression.
Built-in eval suite on MoltBot
Golden datasets, LLM-as-judge, property checks, and CI/CD integration โ zero setup. 14-day free trial.
Start Free Trial โ