Prompt engineering has a split reputation. Critics say it's fragile voodoo. Practitioners who've moved beyond "tell the model what you want" to principled prompt architecture know that the right techniques reliably add 10โ30% accuracy on complex tasks.
Five techniques that move the needle
1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
Ask the model to show its reasoning before giving a final answer. "Think step by step" or "before answering, reason through the problem." Dramatically improves accuracy on multi-step reasoning, math, and logical deduction tasks.
2. Few-Shot Prompting (with selection)
Include 3โ5 worked examples in the prompt. The key insight most teams miss: example selection matters enormously. Pick examples that are semantically similar to the input query using embedding similarity, not random or fixed examples.
3. Self-Consistency
Generate 5โ10 outputs for the same prompt with temperature > 0, then take the majority vote (for classification) or best-of-n (for generation). Reduces variance and improves accuracy without any additional training.
4. System Prompt Architecture
Structure system prompts as: Role โ Context โ Constraints โ Output format โ Examples. Each section does specific work. Role sets the model's perspective. Constraints prevent unwanted outputs. Output format prevents parsing failures.
5. Chain-of-Verification (CoVe)
After the model produces an answer, prompt it to generate verification questions about its own output, answer each one, and revise the answer if any verification fails. Particularly effective for fact-sensitive tasks.
Structured system prompt template
Prompt versioning and A/B testing on MoltBot
Track prompt versions, run A/B tests, and measure accuracy improvement across techniques. 14-day free trial.
Start Free Trial โ